8 Comments
User's avatar
Hannah's avatar

Congrats! …to your brother!

Vanceslifecoach's avatar

Has Mochi had a vasectomy?

Running On Butter's avatar

he needs a lobotomy

Sarah's avatar

Someone has hinted at a big surprise at this upcoming summit! We cannot wait to hear what it is!!

Kirsten Rose's avatar

I see what you did there! 😂🤐

Amelia_theislandgirl's avatar

This was a great article! The prefect way to start a Monday

Juliana Rivera's avatar

"Sex, in this article, is reduced to risk management, bodily autonomy, and the equitable distribution of burdens. Missing entirely is the Christian understanding of sex as a covenantal act ordered toward union and fruitfulness."

Risk management: why bad?

Bodily autonomy: God forbid.

Equitable distribution of burdens: are you arguing you don't want this???

Missing entirely: but did he say it wasn't a covenantal act?

You didn't even argue any points against contraception. Usually people say they don't want to play God, or something like that. All you did was list the very good points he made and imply there's something wrong with them (though you didn't explain why they were so bad).

Not attacking or hate commenting, just challenging because I really expected some attempt at an argument against intentional sterility for Christian men.

Also, let me make another practical argument for it: unlike for women, the surgery can be reversed if they change their mind and want to have another kid.