Run from mockers! Gluttony (related to food inputs) only shows up externally (fat person) in my experience 50% of the time. Plenty of us gluttons who will never be “fat.” :). Stewardship isn’t “balance,” it is selfless living.
So good 👏 And if you just think of the generational consequences of poor health. ‘Loving your neighbor’ is in every way tied to our bodily stewardship.
It deeply concerns me that Wilson in particular, as a pastor, is leading flocks astray in this way especially when it is clear that not all is as it should be with his own health. So instead of dealing with his own health issues, he attacks MAHA moms... Not good, and his peers need to call him out for it.
Of course it’s hyperbolic. But like humor, I think hyperbole has to be based in some level of truth to work. And I don’t necessarily disagree with its use here. I just wanted to point out that the “nonexistent examples” do indeed exist.
This is so good!! Question for clarification, what is the Scripture reference for the mention of milk in the list you gave? Couldn't figure out what verse you meant to reference, I assume there's a typo 🙈
Found you through Elisha & Katie's podcast and have been blessed by your content! Keep on!
yes, there was a typo (my copy editor's on strike). The reference is Deuteronomy 32:14. milk is part of the picture of God’s abundant provision for Israel.
"...the body is shaped by cumulative, everyday inputs. Many people avoid certain foods not because of life-threatening allergies, but because of how those foods affect us 10 years down the road. What seems insignificant in a single meal, over time, meaningfully reshapes the body’s biochemistry to where disease proliferates."
Excellent observation! It alligns with this narrative: "I refer to the very readable review by Philip Calder “A systematic review of the effects of increasing arachidonic acid intake on PUFA status, metabolism and health-related outcomes in humans.” His final statement is that an increase in arachidonic acid intake up to 1.5 grams per day does not significantly change the parameters associated with inflammation, blood clotting or atherogenesis. In this very interesting observation, I was astonished by the fact that the background diet was not taken into account. Although the intake of arachidonic acid with the background diet is reported several times, the resulting metabolic consequences are not discussed.
From the data provided, it can be concluded that the background diet in all studies included in the review was a Western diet, the proportion of arachidonic acid being estimated at 200 to 400 mg per day. Our studies on healthy volunteers were carried out with formula diets and allowed a precisely defined supply of arachidonic acid over a period of 6 weeks. These studies have shown that the exclusion of arachidonic acid from the diet (vegan diet) causes a progressive decrease of this fatty acid from 11 + 3% of the total fatty acids in the cholesterol esters of the plasma to 8 + 2% after 6 weeks. The later studies on patients with rheumatoid arthritis have shown that an intake of arachidonic acid amounting to not more than 80 mg/day does not increase the concentration of arachidonic acid in the phospholipids of the plasma and in the erythrocyte lipids. From these findings I have concluded that the body's own production of arachidonic acid is around 80 mg per day. This means that the Western Diet provides approximately 2.5 to 5 times the estimated need for arachidonic acid.
This intake that is higher than the requirement primarily has no negative consequences. We know from many studies that the "silent inflammation" characteristic for the prevalent diseases of western societies has a latency period of more than 10 years before the consequences such as arteriosclerosis and myocardial infarction become apparent. The body is evidently able to avert the consequences of an unfavorable diet for a long time. To do this, there are numerous regulatory options, such as substrate or product inhibition in the case of enzymes or the inhibition of transport to or incorporation into cells. Arachidonic acid has a very special metabolic pathway that offers possibilities for regulating absorption from the intestine, transport in the chylomicrons, metabolism via the enzymes involved and also for incorporation into the cells. For example, we have found a completely different efficiency for the uptake of arachidonic acid into the cell membrane for platelets compared to erythrocytes or granulocytes. It is therefore very likely that regulation options on the metabolic pathway of arachidonic acid can, to a certain extent, compensate for changes in intake.
Only when too much arachidonic acid is present in the food for a prolonged time do these protective mechanisms apparently fail and inflammation and the manifestation of lifestyle diseases is seen. This explains the long latency period with which the diseases of civilization occur...From my point of view, it would have been more productive from the experimental approach if vegans had been given the doses of arachidonic acid employed in the studies that are included in the review. This would come closer to the desired goal of the effects of arachidonic acid on PUFA status, metabolism and health-related outcomes in humans. Then one could also come to a result for the desirable intake of arachidonic acid, which I estimate for patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases at 80 mg per day, corresponding to 560 mg per week. This corresponds to a diet with 5 vegan days and 2 days with consumption of animal products per week."
The above narrative is excerpted from a message German researcher Olaf Adam sent me September 5, 2021.
There is a way to gage the effects of long-term, excessive arachidonic acid intake; analyze adipose tissue arachidonic acid levels. Unfortunately, there are only two unrelated studies that hint at where the problem lies:
One of your best yet.
Run from mockers! Gluttony (related to food inputs) only shows up externally (fat person) in my experience 50% of the time. Plenty of us gluttons who will never be “fat.” :). Stewardship isn’t “balance,” it is selfless living.
Love reading this…so much encouragement for me to KEEP eating healthy….at 81 yrs of age I’m still going strong.. physically and spiritually!
So good 👏 And if you just think of the generational consequences of poor health. ‘Loving your neighbor’ is in every way tied to our bodily stewardship.
Yes & Amen. Wish more people in the church would discuss this and not say it is vanity to focus on health.
so good!
I Cor. 6:19,20
Thank you for this article ROB.
It deeply concerns me that Wilson in particular, as a pastor, is leading flocks astray in this way especially when it is clear that not all is as it should be with his own health. So instead of dealing with his own health issues, he attacks MAHA moms... Not good, and his peers need to call him out for it.
Agreed brother 👏
Thank you for this.
“Do you hate your children and wish they were never born? Then give them this! (Shows the camera a lollipop)” -AC
Pretending there are no moral implications in the food messaging online is silly!
hyperbole: exaggerated statements or claims not meant to be taken literally.
Of course it’s hyperbolic. But like humor, I think hyperbole has to be based in some level of truth to work. And I don’t necessarily disagree with its use here. I just wanted to point out that the “nonexistent examples” do indeed exist.
Fantastic article
Thank you. appreciate it!
This is so good!! Question for clarification, what is the Scripture reference for the mention of milk in the list you gave? Couldn't figure out what verse you meant to reference, I assume there's a typo 🙈
Found you through Elisha & Katie's podcast and have been blessed by your content! Keep on!
thank you for the kind words!
yes, there was a typo (my copy editor's on strike). The reference is Deuteronomy 32:14. milk is part of the picture of God’s abundant provision for Israel.
Thank you, this was great!
Definitely one of your best! This has been something on my mind. Next you need to write about how to get our families on board with MAHA.
"...the body is shaped by cumulative, everyday inputs. Many people avoid certain foods not because of life-threatening allergies, but because of how those foods affect us 10 years down the road. What seems insignificant in a single meal, over time, meaningfully reshapes the body’s biochemistry to where disease proliferates."
Excellent observation! It alligns with this narrative: "I refer to the very readable review by Philip Calder “A systematic review of the effects of increasing arachidonic acid intake on PUFA status, metabolism and health-related outcomes in humans.” His final statement is that an increase in arachidonic acid intake up to 1.5 grams per day does not significantly change the parameters associated with inflammation, blood clotting or atherogenesis. In this very interesting observation, I was astonished by the fact that the background diet was not taken into account. Although the intake of arachidonic acid with the background diet is reported several times, the resulting metabolic consequences are not discussed.
From the data provided, it can be concluded that the background diet in all studies included in the review was a Western diet, the proportion of arachidonic acid being estimated at 200 to 400 mg per day. Our studies on healthy volunteers were carried out with formula diets and allowed a precisely defined supply of arachidonic acid over a period of 6 weeks. These studies have shown that the exclusion of arachidonic acid from the diet (vegan diet) causes a progressive decrease of this fatty acid from 11 + 3% of the total fatty acids in the cholesterol esters of the plasma to 8 + 2% after 6 weeks. The later studies on patients with rheumatoid arthritis have shown that an intake of arachidonic acid amounting to not more than 80 mg/day does not increase the concentration of arachidonic acid in the phospholipids of the plasma and in the erythrocyte lipids. From these findings I have concluded that the body's own production of arachidonic acid is around 80 mg per day. This means that the Western Diet provides approximately 2.5 to 5 times the estimated need for arachidonic acid.
This intake that is higher than the requirement primarily has no negative consequences. We know from many studies that the "silent inflammation" characteristic for the prevalent diseases of western societies has a latency period of more than 10 years before the consequences such as arteriosclerosis and myocardial infarction become apparent. The body is evidently able to avert the consequences of an unfavorable diet for a long time. To do this, there are numerous regulatory options, such as substrate or product inhibition in the case of enzymes or the inhibition of transport to or incorporation into cells. Arachidonic acid has a very special metabolic pathway that offers possibilities for regulating absorption from the intestine, transport in the chylomicrons, metabolism via the enzymes involved and also for incorporation into the cells. For example, we have found a completely different efficiency for the uptake of arachidonic acid into the cell membrane for platelets compared to erythrocytes or granulocytes. It is therefore very likely that regulation options on the metabolic pathway of arachidonic acid can, to a certain extent, compensate for changes in intake.
Only when too much arachidonic acid is present in the food for a prolonged time do these protective mechanisms apparently fail and inflammation and the manifestation of lifestyle diseases is seen. This explains the long latency period with which the diseases of civilization occur...From my point of view, it would have been more productive from the experimental approach if vegans had been given the doses of arachidonic acid employed in the studies that are included in the review. This would come closer to the desired goal of the effects of arachidonic acid on PUFA status, metabolism and health-related outcomes in humans. Then one could also come to a result for the desirable intake of arachidonic acid, which I estimate for patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases at 80 mg per day, corresponding to 560 mg per week. This corresponds to a diet with 5 vegan days and 2 days with consumption of animal products per week."
The above narrative is excerpted from a message German researcher Olaf Adam sent me September 5, 2021.
There is a way to gage the effects of long-term, excessive arachidonic acid intake; analyze adipose tissue arachidonic acid levels. Unfortunately, there are only two unrelated studies that hint at where the problem lies:
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2730166/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39914497/